<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Camb-Hams DX Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dx.camb-hams.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dx.camb-hams.com</link>
	<description>Blogging from the remotest reaches of the Scottish Isles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:53:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CUWS in FP &#8217;11 by Vlad</title>
		<link>http://dx.camb-hams.com/dx-peditions/cuws-in-fp/comment-page-1/#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dx.camb-hams.com/?page_id=2000#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>Dear Gavin!
It was the sure contact of September 29 on 20 meters at 18.07 GMT by SSB, but I do not find it in a log for some reason.
73! Vlad/UA3ECJ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Gavin!<br />
It was the sure contact of September 29 on 20 meters at 18.07 GMT by SSB, but I do not find it in a log for some reason.<br />
73! Vlad/UA3ECJ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CUWS in FP &#8217;11 by M0VFC</title>
		<link>http://dx.camb-hams.com/dx-peditions/cuws-in-fp/comment-page-1/#comment-3339</link>
		<dc:creator>M0VFC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dx.camb-hams.com/?page_id=2000#comment-3339</guid>
		<description>Hi Bob,

Thanks for the comments - as usual, it&#039;s a balancing act. Reviewing some of the recordings we took, I reckon about 30% of my TX time was spent saying my own callsign (such is life with a long reciprocal call!). In the vast majority of cases, it was phonetic; sometimes dropping to non-phonetic for alternate QSOs during the busiest pile-ups.

I&#039;ve worked DX in the past where there&#039;s been one ident every ten minutes if you were lucky, and we were very conscious not to let this be the case for us as we&#039;re aware how infuriating it can be.

However, the reverse is that if we had a huge pile of stations waiting to work us, we wanted to give as many as possible the opportunity to do so - and since the vast majority did manage to copy the call, I hope we got things about right.

Sorry if it was a little quick for you; I have no problems at all slowing down for someone if they need me too, but in at least a lot of cases, it came accross more like it was people discovering a pile-up and rushing to work it without stopping to listen, or appreciate that others were waiting to work us as well.

Definitely noted on the speed during the quieter times, though - we&#039;ll bear that in mind.

73,
Rob, M0VFC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bob,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments &#8211; as usual, it&#8217;s a balancing act. Reviewing some of the recordings we took, I reckon about 30% of my TX time was spent saying my own callsign (such is life with a long reciprocal call!). In the vast majority of cases, it was phonetic; sometimes dropping to non-phonetic for alternate QSOs during the busiest pile-ups.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve worked DX in the past where there&#8217;s been one ident every ten minutes if you were lucky, and we were very conscious not to let this be the case for us as we&#8217;re aware how infuriating it can be.</p>
<p>However, the reverse is that if we had a huge pile of stations waiting to work us, we wanted to give as many as possible the opportunity to do so &#8211; and since the vast majority did manage to copy the call, I hope we got things about right.</p>
<p>Sorry if it was a little quick for you; I have no problems at all slowing down for someone if they need me too, but in at least a lot of cases, it came accross more like it was people discovering a pile-up and rushing to work it without stopping to listen, or appreciate that others were waiting to work us as well.</p>
<p>Definitely noted on the speed during the quieter times, though &#8211; we&#8217;ll bear that in mind.</p>
<p>73,<br />
Rob, M0VFC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CUWS in FP &#8217;11 by Bob VE3MPG</title>
		<link>http://dx.camb-hams.com/dx-peditions/cuws-in-fp/comment-page-1/#comment-3334</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob VE3MPG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 15:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dx.camb-hams.com/?page_id=2000#comment-3334</guid>
		<description>Regarding the constant asking for your callsigns -&gt; I tried to work your group from Ottawa for 2 days. Your signal was very very strong here but the ops were just talking much too fast. I am an old timer with hearing difficulties and spent time trying to decipher exchanges and operator call at your end. I used a DX cluster to find what call was being used but in the end I never did work you as I never would have deciphered the exchange as it was much too fast. Even during lulls in the pile-ups the ops were repeating their calls too fast so maybe look at that for your next dxpedition. Clear diction and slowing down would have been a big help to many operators wanting the FP call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the constant asking for your callsigns -&gt; I tried to work your group from Ottawa for 2 days. Your signal was very very strong here but the ops were just talking much too fast. I am an old timer with hearing difficulties and spent time trying to decipher exchanges and operator call at your end. I used a DX cluster to find what call was being used but in the end I never did work you as I never would have deciphered the exchange as it was much too fast. Even during lulls in the pile-ups the ops were repeating their calls too fast so maybe look at that for your next dxpedition. Clear diction and slowing down would have been a big help to many operators wanting the FP call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How things sound from our side&#8230; by Steve WA8Y</title>
		<link>http://dx.camb-hams.com/2011/09/28/how-things-sound-from-our-side/comment-page-1/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve WA8Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dx.camb-hams.com/?p=2040#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>I hope to find you on 40m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope to find you on 40m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CUWS in FP Update by Steve</title>
		<link>http://dx.camb-hams.com/2011/09/27/cuws-in-fp-update/comment-page-1/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 22:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dx.camb-hams.com/?p=2032#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>When will you be on 80 and 40m?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When will you be on 80 and 40m?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

